┐ Erik Madigan Heck └

© Erik Madigan Heck, from Undercover Jun Takahashi

© Erik Madigan Heck, from Undercover Jun Takahashi

(…)

Heck’s working methods also demonstrate his independent streak. He eschews strobes and rarely shoots digitally. He even pooh-poohs test Polaroids, which would help ensure the usability of images captured with his 15-year-old, all-manual, 35mm Canon EOS 630. “I show up for a job with just a little bag,” he says with a smile. “Some people get nervous, and some people think it’s funny. I tell people that they’re hiring me because they know my work and they shouldn’t mess with my shtick. I also remind them they’re saving money because I don’t roll up with 1,000 lights and four assistants.”


Still, shooting without a digital safety net has its dodgy moments. He recalls one from an assignment for designer Haider Ackermann in Florence, Italy, inside the 17th-century Palazzo Corsini. During the shoot, clouds rolled across the Tuscan sky, changing the lighting conditions every 10 minutes. “I was a little scared,” Heck admits, “because they had flown me halfway around the world. But I like that suspense.” He feels the lag required for developing and printing film is also a positive. “I think it’s good for the client to wait two days before seeing images,” he says. “By then they have disassociated themselves from the day of shooting and look at the photos more clearly.”


Despite his penchant for low-tech detailing, Heck works hard to keep darkroom razzle-dazzle from defining him. Instead, he tries to be a chameleon, crafting each shot to the client’s needs. This approach has led him to solarize a portrait of artist Gerhard Richter, to flip and manually rebuild a still from La Traviata for the Metropolitan Opera and, for Japanese designer Jun Takahashi, to create an updated take on Weegee’s famous crime-scene photos—complete with smears of fake blood and real bullets narrowly missing pricey sneakers and pants.


Pressed for more details about how he juices his shots, Heck politely demurs in the interest of maintaining the mystery. “But I will say this,” he allows: “It is not as hard as it looks. And it’s more fun than Photoshop. It’s more of a science experiment.
(…)

source: american mag

More of Erik’s work here

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s